Skip to main content

12: States of consciousness: first, second and third state

 ‘Higher’ states of consciousness were regularly explained and demonstrated (up to a point) in the introductory meetings I attended, and occasionally led, at the London branch of our fourth way school.

Up to now I have put ‘higher’ in inverted commas because it is a commonplace that altered states can be produced, for example with alcohol, without there being anything ‘higher’ about them (other than being pleasant). The desire in humans for altered states is almost universal. Some cultures that ban alcohol permit tobacco and coffee, for example. Children sometimes play the game of spinning round until they feel dizzy, or the trick of squatting, nose-holding against expiration (Valsalva) and then suddenly standing up, to produce a momentary pre-faint. In the ’60s hallucinogens were popular with some groups of people.


According to the fourth way, at any rate as I was taught it, some drugs can give you a taste of higher states but these states are not permanent, they do not belong to you and are not under your control. Thus, on meeting the fourth way it is necessary to give up the use of drugs for this purpose.


The explanation of different levels of consciousness as we gave it in the introductory meetings is as follows: 


The first level (first state) is sleep. We did not distinguish between dreaming and dreamless sleep.


Second state is ‘waking sleep’ and is what we call normal waking consciousness, but according to the fourth way this is little different from first state. In second state most of our thought, behaviour and speech is automatic, a kind of word-association, or like a pinball machine, in which one thing follows another associatively. ‘Man is a machine’ according to Gurdjieff. That this is the usual state of the mind is readily observable by anyone willing to be an objectively impartial observer. At any rate, I’ll bet I’m not the only one to have a mind that very often runs all by itself to very little purpose. The process can also be observed in normal non-academic conversation. Where a conversation begins and where it ends are usually unrelated. 


Third state is self-remembering. Everything else is still going on, but we can make a little effort to be simultaneously aware of our own bodies. It is not just stuff going on, but ourselves as part of what is going on. One might say, we are actors in what is taking place. It is a subtle but at the same time a major shift in perspective. One jumps in and out of it suddenly, like that optical illusion which is now a rabbit, now a duck.


We used to induce this state by asking attendees at the meeting simply to fall silent and become aware of the weight of the body on the chair, the air on the face, the flowers in the vase, the sounds coming into the room from outside. 


Publication date 7 September 2021
Book links: 

or search on Martin Braybrooke

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

3.2: Influence C in the Fellowship

When I joined the Fellowship I never questioned its authenticity as a fourth way school. I simply accepted the rules, did the exercises and enjoyed the sense of being on a meaningful journey. I felt I was able to verify the teacher through the people around me and the teaching itself. At no point did the question of lineage arise as a problem for me. Once I was asked about it in a prospective student meeting and replied that the System came to our teacher through Rodney Collin and Alex Horn, Robert Burton’s teacher. After the meeting another student quite rightly said to me that we shouldn’t claim a connection with Rodney Collin because we don’t know this for certain. Lineage was always claimed by Robert Burton through Alex Horn, but it is not at all clear what connection Horn had with the fourth way of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky. There is a suggestion that Horn visited Collin in Mexico, but there is scant evidence that he stayed for any length of time or learned anything from him. Howeve

3.7: Centres of gravity and body types

You’re nothing but a pack of cards! —Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland  I do not recall reading anywhere in Gurdjieff’s or Ouspensky’s works the idea of body types or centres of gravity. The idea of body types appears to derive from Rodney Collin’s Theory of Celestial Influence and that of centres of gravity is, as far as I can tell, an innovation by Robert Burton, although I do not know for certain.  In essence both sets of ideas are peripheral to the aim of the fourth way, but they have their uses. Both sets of ideas provide a framework in which one can identify the mechanics of one’s ‘machine.’ This enables one better to understand one’s mechanical or automatic reactions to people and situations and thus become more forgiving and accepting of oneself and others.  The idea of centres of gravity appears to be an embellishment on the division of the body into head, heart and guts, or intellectual centre, emotional centre and instinctive-moving centre, which is discussed in In Search

3.3: The Fourth Way to what?

  If I were to formulate from today’s understanding what my aim was when I first joined SES at the age of seventeen, it would be to acquire a sense of peace and that clear state of awareness that went with it, and also the delight of understanding the world from a set of ideas that made it make sense. It is hard to accept that sometimes it doesn’t. Stepping back, what is the aim of the fourth way from the point of view of its basic texts? The most fundamental texts are arguably Ouspensky’s The Psychology of Man’s Possible Evolution and his In Search of the Miraculous , also Gurdjieff’s All and Everything .  Life is only real then, when I am starts with a summary of the intended results of Gurdjieff’s All and Everything , of which Life is the third series. The summary is as follows: FIRST SERIES: To destroy, mercilessly, without any compromises whatsoever, in the mentation and feelings of the reader, the beliefs and views, by centuries rooted in him, about everything existing in the